Eritrea vs Finland: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Eritrea
81.4%
in 2019
Finland
81.9%
in 2019
Eritrea rank
20th
Finland rank
17th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Eritrea
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 81.9% against 81.4% in Eritrea, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 20th and Finland ranks 17th of 190 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.4% | 85.2% | 3.7% | Finland |
| 2010s | 81.4% | 82.2% | 0.8% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Eritrea or Finland?
- Finland, at 81.9% against 81.4% in Eritrea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Eritrea and Finland?
- 0.5%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Finland?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea and Finland rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Eritrea ranks 20th and Finland ranks 17th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.