Equatorial Guinea vs Poland: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Equatorial Guinea
78.2%
in 2019
Poland
78.3%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
34th
Poland rank
33rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 78.3% against 78.2% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 34th and Poland ranks 33rd of 190 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.3% | 78.7% | 0.6% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 78.5% | 78.4% | 0.1% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Poland?
- Poland, at 78.3% against 78.2% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Poland?
- 0.1%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Poland?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Poland rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 34th and Poland ranks 33rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.