Ecuador vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Ecuador
69.5%
in 2019
New Zealand
69.5%
in 2019
Ecuador rank
92nd
New Zealand rank
92nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Ecuador
- New Zealand
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 69.5% against 69.5% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 92nd and New Zealand ranks 92nd of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.5% | 75.3% | 5.8% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 69.5% | 70.6% | 1.1% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Ecuador or New Zealand?
- Ecuador, at 69.5% against 69.5% in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Ecuador and New Zealand?
- 0.0%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and New Zealand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Ecuador and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Ecuador ranks 92nd and New Zealand ranks 92nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.