Denmark vs Lithuania: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score

Denmark
73.9%
in 2019
Lithuania
73.6%
in 2019
Denmark rank
62nd
Lithuania rank
65th

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time

  • Denmark
  • Lithuania
020406080200320112019

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 73.9% against 73.6% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.3%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Lithuania ahead.

Denmark ranks 62nd and Lithuania ranks 65th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 73.5% 73.6% 0.1% Lithuania
2010s 73.9% 73.6% 0.3% Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Denmark or Lithuania?
Denmark, at 73.9% against 73.6% in Lithuania as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Denmark and Lithuania?
0.3%, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Lithuania?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Denmark and Lithuania rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
Denmark ranks 62nd and Lithuania ranks 65th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.