Denmark vs Japan: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Denmark
73.9%
in 2019
Japan
73.8%
in 2019
Denmark rank
62nd
Japan rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Denmark
- Japan
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 73.9% against 73.8% in Japan, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 62nd and Japan ranks 63rd of 190 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.5% | 63.9% | 9.6% | Denmark |
| 2010s | 73.9% | 70.8% | 3.1% | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Denmark or Japan?
- Denmark, at 73.9% against 73.8% in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Denmark and Japan?
- 0.1%, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Japan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and Japan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Denmark ranks 62nd and Japan ranks 63rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.