Côte d'Ivoire vs Dominican Republic: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Côte d'Ivoire
53.2%
in 2019
Dominican Republic
54.1%
in 2019
Côte d'Ivoire rank
153rd
Dominican Republic rank
151st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 54.1% against 53.2% in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 153rd and Dominican Republic ranks 151st of 191 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.2% | 54.1% | 0.9% | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 53.2% | 54.1% | 0.9% | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Côte d'Ivoire or Dominican Republic?
- Dominican Republic, at 54.1% against 53.2% in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Côte d'Ivoire and Dominican Republic?
- 0.9%, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Dominican Republic?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Dominican Republic rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 153rd and Dominican Republic ranks 151st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.