Costa Rica vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Costa Rica
72.8%
in 2019
Mauritius
72.0%
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
69th
Mauritius rank
72nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Mauritius
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 72.8% against 72.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mauritius ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 69th and Mauritius ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.8% | 81.8% | 9.0% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 72.8% | 74.9% | 2.1% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Costa Rica or Mauritius?
- Costa Rica, at 72.8% against 72.0% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Costa Rica and Mauritius?
- 0.8%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mauritius?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 69th and Mauritius ranks 72nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.