Congo vs Vanuatu: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Congo
40.3%
in 2019
Vanuatu
37.1%
in 2019
Congo rank
170th
Vanuatu rank
172nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Congo
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Congo currently reports 40.3% against 37.1% in Vanuatu, a difference of 3.2%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Vanuatu's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 170th and Vanuatu ranks 172nd of 188 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.3% | 37.1% | 3.1% | Congo |
| 2010s | 40.3% | 37.1% | 3.1% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Congo or Vanuatu?
- Congo, at 40.3% against 37.1% in Vanuatu as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Congo and Vanuatu?
- 3.2%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Vanuatu?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Vanuatu rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Congo ranks 170th and Vanuatu ranks 172nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.