Congo vs Mozambique: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Congo
40.3%
in 2019
Mozambique
40.2%
in 2019
Congo rank
172nd
Mozambique rank
173rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Congo
- Mozambique
How they compare
Congo currently reports 40.3% against 40.2% in Mozambique, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 172nd and Mozambique ranks 173rd of 190 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.3% | 40.2% | 0.1% | Congo |
| 2010s | 40.3% | 40.2% | 0.1% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Congo or Mozambique?
- Congo, at 40.3% against 40.2% in Mozambique as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Congo and Mozambique?
- 0.1%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mozambique?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Mozambique rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Congo ranks 172nd and Mozambique ranks 173rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.