China, People's Republic of vs Seychelles: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
China, People's Republic of
81.9%
in 2019
Seychelles
82.8%
in 2019
China, People's Republic of rank
16th
Seychelles rank
14th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- China, People's Republic of
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 82.8% against 81.9% in China, People's Republic of, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was China, People's Republic of ahead.
China, People's Republic of ranks 16th and Seychelles ranks 14th of 190 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, People's Republic of | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84.0% | 84.0% | 0.0% | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 82.3% | 82.8% | 0.5% | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, China, People's Republic of or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 82.8% against 81.9% in China, People's Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between China, People's Republic of and Seychelles?
- 0.9%, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, People's Republic of and Seychelles?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do China, People's Republic of and Seychelles rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- China, People's Republic of ranks 16th and Seychelles ranks 14th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.