China vs Russian Federation: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
China
81.9%
in 2019
Russian Federation
81.6%
in 2019
China rank
16th
Russian Federation rank
19th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- China
- Russian Federation
How they compare
China currently reports 81.9% against 81.6% in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was China ahead.
China ranks 16th and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 191 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.1% | 85.0% | 0.0% | China |
| 2010s | 82.3% | 82.2% | 0.0% | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, China or Russian Federation?
- China, at 81.9% against 81.6% in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between China and Russian Federation?
- 0.3%, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Russian Federation?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do China and Russian Federation rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- China ranks 16th and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.