China, People's Republic of vs Cyprus: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
China, People's Republic of
81.9%
in 2019
Cyprus
81.7%
in 2019
China, People's Republic of rank
16th
Cyprus rank
18th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- China, People's Republic of
- Cyprus
How they compare
China, People's Republic of currently reports 81.9% against 81.7% in Cyprus, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 12 years both countries report, China, People's Republic of has been ahead every year.
China, People's Republic of ranks 16th and Cyprus ranks 18th of 190 countries.
China, People's Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, People's Republic of | Cyprus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83.1% | 81.7% | 1.5% | China, People's Republic of |
| 2010s | 82.3% | 81.7% | 0.6% | China, People's Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, China, People's Republic of or Cyprus?
- China, People's Republic of, at 81.9% against 81.7% in Cyprus as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between China, People's Republic of and Cyprus?
- 0.2%, with China, People's Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, People's Republic of and Cyprus?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do China, People's Republic of and Cyprus rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- China, People's Republic of ranks 16th and Cyprus ranks 18th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.