Canada vs Sri Lanka: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Canada
75.0%
in 2019
Sri Lanka
74.5%
in 2019
Canada rank
51st
Sri Lanka rank
54th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Canada
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Canada currently reports 75.0% against 74.5% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 51st and Sri Lanka ranks 54th of 190 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.0% | 74.5% | 0.6% | Canada |
| 2010s | 75.0% | 74.5% | 0.6% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Canada or Sri Lanka?
- Canada, at 75.0% against 74.5% in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Canada and Sri Lanka?
- 0.5%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Sri Lanka?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Canada and Sri Lanka rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Canada ranks 51st and Sri Lanka ranks 54th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.