Cabo Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Cabo Verde
77.8%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
78.2%
in 2019
Cabo Verde rank
36th
Equatorial Guinea rank
34th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Cabo Verde
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 78.2% against 77.8% in Cabo Verde, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 36th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 34th of 190 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.6% | 79.3% | 3.7% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 77.6% | 78.5% | 0.9% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Cabo Verde or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 78.2% against 77.8% in Cabo Verde as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Cabo Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.4%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cabo Verde and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Cabo Verde ranks 36th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 34th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.