Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Burkina Faso
8.2%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
6.6%
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
185th
Zimbabwe rank
187th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 8.2% against 6.6% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 185th and Zimbabwe ranks 187th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.0% | 64.1% | 61.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 8.2% | 4.6% | 3.6% | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
- Burkina Faso, at 8.2% against 6.6% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
- 1.6%, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 185th and Zimbabwe ranks 187th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.