Burkina Faso vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 9.4% against 8.2% in Burkina Faso, a difference of 1.2%.
That makes Congo, Democratic Republic of the's figure about 1.2 times Burkina Faso's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 185th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 184th of 191 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Congo, Democratic Republic of the | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.0% | 0.0% | 3.0% | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 8.2% | 6.6% | 1.6% | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Burkina Faso or Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 9.4% against 8.2% in Burkina Faso as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Burkina Faso and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 1.2%, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 185th and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 184th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.