Brunei vs Malaysia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Brunei
58.9%
in 2019
Malaysia
57.5%
in 2019
Brunei rank
140th
Malaysia rank
143rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Brunei
- Malaysia
How they compare
Brunei currently reports 58.9% against 57.5% in Malaysia, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Malaysia ahead.
Brunei ranks 140th and Malaysia ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.9% | 69.2% | 10.2% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 58.9% | 61.0% | 2.0% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Brunei or Malaysia?
- Brunei, at 58.9% against 57.5% in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Brunei and Malaysia?
- 1.4%, with Brunei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Malaysia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brunei and Malaysia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Brunei ranks 140th and Malaysia ranks 143rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.