Brazil vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Brazil
75.4%
in 2019
Tunisia
75.6%
in 2019
Brazil rank
49th
Tunisia rank
47th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Brazil
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 75.6% against 75.4% in Brazil, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 49th and Tunisia ranks 47th of 191 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.6% | 75.6% | 6.0% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 77.7% | 75.6% | 2.1% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Brazil or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 75.6% against 75.4% in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Brazil and Tunisia?
- 0.2%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Tunisia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Brazil ranks 49th and Tunisia ranks 47th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.