Brazil vs Qatar: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Brazil
75.4%
in 2019
Qatar
75.8%
in 2019
Brazil rank
49th
Qatar rank
46th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Brazil
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 75.8% against 75.4% in Brazil, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 49th and Qatar ranks 46th of 190 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.6% | 75.8% | 5.7% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 77.7% | 75.8% | 1.9% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Brazil or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 75.8% against 75.4% in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Brazil and Qatar?
- 0.4%, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Qatar?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Qatar rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Brazil ranks 49th and Qatar ranks 46th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.