Brazil vs Greece: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Brazil
75.4%
in 2019
Greece
74.9%
in 2019
Brazil rank
49th
Greece rank
52nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Brazil
- Greece
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 75.4% against 74.9% in Greece, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 49th and Greece ranks 52nd of 190 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.6% | 74.9% | 6.6% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 77.7% | 74.9% | 2.8% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Brazil or Greece?
- Brazil, at 75.4% against 74.9% in Greece as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Brazil and Greece?
- 0.5%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Greece?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Greece rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Brazil ranks 49th and Greece ranks 52nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.