Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Namibia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
59.6%
in 2019
Namibia
59.8%
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
136th
Namibia rank
135th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 59.8% against 59.6% in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 136th and Namibia ranks 135th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.9% | 59.8% | 2.0% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 59.6% | 59.8% | 0.2% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 59.8% against 59.6% in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
- 0.2%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Namibia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 136th and Namibia ranks 135th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.