Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Dominica: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
59.6%
in 2019
Dominica
59.6%
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
136th
Dominica rank
136th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Dominica
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 59.6% against 59.6% in Dominica, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 136th and Dominica ranks 136th of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Dominica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.9% | 59.6% | 2.2% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 59.6% | 59.6% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Dominica?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 59.6% against 59.6% in Dominica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Dominica?
- 0.0%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Dominica?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Dominica rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 136th and Dominica ranks 136th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.