Bolivia vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Bolivia
72.0%
in 2019
Mauritius
72.0%
in 2019
Bolivia rank
72nd
Mauritius rank
72nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Bolivia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 72.0% against 72.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 72nd and Mauritius ranks 72nd of 190 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.0% | 81.8% | 9.8% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 72.0% | 74.9% | 2.9% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Bolivia or Mauritius?
- Bolivia, at 72.0% against 72.0% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Bolivia and Mauritius?
- 0.0%, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Mauritius?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Bolivia ranks 72nd and Mauritius ranks 72nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.