Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Georgia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
72.0%
in 2019
Georgia
72.0%
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
72nd
Georgia rank
72nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Georgia
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 72.0% against 72.0% in Georgia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 72nd and Georgia ranks 72nd of 190 countries.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.0% | 61.8% | 10.2% | Bolivia, Plurinational State of |
| 2010s | 72.0% | 72.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Georgia?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 72.0% against 72.0% in Georgia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Georgia?
- 0.0%, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Georgia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Georgia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 72nd and Georgia ranks 72nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.