Bhutan vs Uruguay: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Bhutan
74.1%
in 2019
Uruguay
74.0%
in 2019
Bhutan rank
57th
Uruguay rank
59th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Bhutan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 74.1% against 74.0% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Uruguay ahead.
Bhutan ranks 57th and Uruguay ranks 59th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.1% | 74.0% | 16.9% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 84.5% | 74.0% | 10.5% | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Bhutan or Uruguay?
- Bhutan, at 74.1% against 74.0% in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Bhutan and Uruguay?
- 0.1%, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Uruguay?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bhutan and Uruguay rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Bhutan ranks 57th and Uruguay ranks 59th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.