Bhutan vs Mongolia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Bhutan
74.1%
in 2019
Mongolia
74.4%
in 2019
Bhutan rank
57th
Mongolia rank
55th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Bhutan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 74.4% against 74.1% in Bhutan, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mongolia ahead.
Bhutan ranks 57th and Mongolia ranks 55th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.1% | 65.7% | 8.5% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 84.5% | 67.4% | 17.1% | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Bhutan or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 74.4% against 74.1% in Bhutan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Bhutan and Mongolia?
- 0.3%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Mongolia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bhutan and Mongolia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Bhutan ranks 57th and Mongolia ranks 55th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.