Belgium vs Estonia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Belgium
79.9%
in 2019
Estonia
80.7%
in 2019
Belgium rank
26th
Estonia rank
24th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Belgium
- Estonia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 80.7% against 79.9% in Belgium, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Estonia ahead.
Belgium ranks 26th and Estonia ranks 24th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.2% | 80.2% | 0.0% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 80.0% | 77.6% | 2.4% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Belgium or Estonia?
- Estonia, at 80.7% against 79.9% in Belgium as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Belgium and Estonia?
- 0.8%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Estonia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Belgium and Estonia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Belgium ranks 26th and Estonia ranks 24th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.