Barbados vs Equatorial Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Barbados
78.0%
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
78.2%
in 2019
Barbados rank
35th
Equatorial Guinea rank
34th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Barbados
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 78.2% against 78.0% in Barbados, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 35th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 34th of 190 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Barbados or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 78.2% against 78.0% in Barbados as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Barbados and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.2%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Equatorial Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Barbados and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Barbados ranks 35th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 34th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.