Austria vs Pakistan: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Austria
76.9%
in 2019
Pakistan
77.0%
in 2019
Austria rank
42nd
Pakistan rank
41st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Austria
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 77.0% against 76.9% in Austria, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 42nd and Pakistan ranks 41st of 190 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.4% | 73.3% | 8.1% | Austria |
| 2010s | 77.0% | 75.9% | 1.1% | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Austria or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 77.0% against 76.9% in Austria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Austria and Pakistan?
- 0.1%, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Pakistan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Pakistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Austria ranks 42nd and Pakistan ranks 41st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.