Austria vs Malta: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Austria
76.9%
in 2019
Malta
75.9%
in 2019
Austria rank
42nd
Malta rank
45th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Austria
- Malta
How they compare
Austria currently reports 76.9% against 75.9% in Malta, a difference of 1.0%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 42nd and Malta ranks 45th of 188 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Austria or Malta?
- Austria, at 76.9% against 75.9% in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Austria and Malta?
- 1.0%, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Malta?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Austria and Malta rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Austria ranks 42nd and Malta ranks 45th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.