Australia vs Latvia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Australia
74.0%
in 2019
Latvia
74.1%
in 2019
Australia rank
59th
Latvia rank
57th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Australia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 74.1% against 74.0% in Australia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Latvia ahead.
Australia ranks 59th and Latvia ranks 57th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.3% | 80.7% | 5.5% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 74.1% | 74.1% | 0.0% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Australia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 74.1% against 74.0% in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Australia and Latvia?
- 0.1%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Australia ranks 59th and Latvia ranks 57th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.