Australia vs Denmark: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Australia
74.0%
in 2019
Denmark
73.9%
in 2019
Australia rank
59th
Denmark rank
62nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Australia
- Denmark
How they compare
Australia currently reports 74.0% against 73.9% in Denmark, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 59th and Denmark ranks 62nd of 188 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.3% | 73.5% | 1.8% | Australia |
| 2010s | 74.1% | 73.9% | 0.2% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Australia or Denmark?
- Australia, at 74.0% against 73.9% in Denmark as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Australia and Denmark?
- 0.1%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Denmark?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Denmark rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Australia ranks 59th and Denmark ranks 62nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.