Australia vs Bhutan: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Australia
74.0%
in 2019
Bhutan
74.1%
in 2019
Australia rank
59th
Bhutan rank
57th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Australia
- Bhutan
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 74.1% against 74.0% in Australia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 59th and Bhutan ranks 57th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Bhutan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.3% | 57.1% | 18.1% | Australia |
| 2010s | 74.1% | 84.5% | 10.3% | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Australia or Bhutan?
- Bhutan, at 74.1% against 74.0% in Australia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Australia and Bhutan?
- 0.1%, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bhutan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Bhutan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Australia ranks 59th and Bhutan ranks 57th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.