Armenia vs Croatia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Armenia
82.1%
in 2019
Croatia
83.0%
in 2019
Armenia rank
15th
Croatia rank
12th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Armenia
- Croatia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 83.0% against 82.1% in Armenia, a difference of 0.9%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 15th and Croatia ranks 12th of 191 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.5% | 86.3% | 9.8% | Croatia |
| 2010s | 80.4% | 83.7% | 3.2% | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Armenia or Croatia?
- Croatia, at 83.0% against 82.1% in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Armenia and Croatia?
- 0.9%, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Croatia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Croatia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Armenia ranks 15th and Croatia ranks 12th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.