Argentina vs Mongolia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Argentina
74.8%
in 2019
Mongolia
74.4%
in 2019
Argentina rank
53rd
Mongolia rank
55th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Argentina
- Mongolia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 74.8% against 74.4% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 53rd and Mongolia ranks 55th of 190 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.6% | 65.7% | 15.9% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 76.8% | 67.4% | 9.4% | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Argentina or Mongolia?
- Argentina, at 74.8% against 74.4% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Argentina and Mongolia?
- 0.4%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Mongolia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Mongolia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Argentina ranks 53rd and Mongolia ranks 55th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.