Antigua and Barbuda vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
69.6%
in 2019
New Zealand
69.5%
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
91st
New Zealand rank
92nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- New Zealand
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 69.6% against 69.5% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Zealand ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 91st and New Zealand ranks 92nd of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.6% | 75.3% | 5.6% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 69.6% | 70.6% | 1.0% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or New Zealand?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 69.6% against 69.5% in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and New Zealand?
- 0.1%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and New Zealand?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 91st and New Zealand ranks 92nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.