Algeria vs Brazil: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Algeria
75.6%
in 2019
Brazil
75.4%
in 2019
Algeria rank
47th
Brazil rank
49th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Algeria
- Brazil
How they compare
Algeria currently reports 75.6% against 75.4% in Brazil, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Brazil ahead.
Algeria ranks 47th and Brazil ranks 49th of 190 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.3% | 81.6% | 8.2% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 74.7% | 77.7% | 3.0% | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Algeria or Brazil?
- Algeria, at 75.6% against 75.4% in Brazil as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Algeria and Brazil?
- 0.2%, with Algeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Brazil?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Algeria and Brazil rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Algeria ranks 47th and Brazil ranks 49th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.