Afghanistan vs Syria: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Afghanistan
67.5%
in 2019
Syria
67.2%
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
104th
Syria rank
106th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Syria
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 67.5% against 67.2% in Syria, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 104th and Syria ranks 106th of 191 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Syria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.5% | 67.2% | 0.3% | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 67.5% | 67.2% | 0.3% | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Afghanistan or Syria?
- Afghanistan, at 67.5% against 67.2% in Syria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Afghanistan and Syria?
- 0.3%, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Syria?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Syria rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Afghanistan ranks 104th and Syria ranks 106th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.