Afghanistan vs South Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Afghanistan
67.5%
in 2019
South Sudan
66.4%
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
104th
South Sudan rank
107th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Afghanistan
- South Sudan
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 67.5% against 66.4% in South Sudan, a difference of 1.1%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 104th and South Sudan ranks 107th of 191 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Afghanistan or South Sudan?
- Afghanistan, at 67.5% against 66.4% in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Afghanistan and South Sudan?
- 1.1%, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and South Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Afghanistan ranks 104th and South Sudan ranks 107th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.