Afghanistan vs Bahamas: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Afghanistan
67.5%
in 2019
Bahamas
67.6%
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
104th
Bahamas rank
103rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Bahamas
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 67.6% against 67.5% in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Bahamas has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 104th and Bahamas ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Bahamas | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.5% | 67.6% | 0.1% | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 67.5% | 67.6% | 0.1% | Bahamas |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Afghanistan or Bahamas?
- Bahamas, at 67.6% against 67.5% in Afghanistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Afghanistan and Bahamas?
- 0.1%, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Bahamas?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Bahamas rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Afghanistan ranks 104th and Bahamas ranks 103rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.