Sweden vs Tonga: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Sweden
30.4%
in 2019
Tonga
30.5%
in 2019
Sweden rank
77th
Tonga rank
75th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Sweden
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 30.5% against 30.4% in Sweden, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Sweden ahead.
Sweden ranks 77th and Tonga ranks 75th of 188 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.3% | 30.5% | 0.8% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 30.8% | 30.5% | 0.3% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Sweden or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 30.5% against 30.4% in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Sweden and Tonga?
- 0.1%, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Tonga?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Sweden and Tonga rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Sweden ranks 77th and Tonga ranks 75th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.