Spain vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Spain
17.2%
in 2019
Thailand
16.9%
in 2019
Spain rank
168th
Thailand rank
170th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Spain
- Thailand
How they compare
Spain currently reports 17.2% against 16.9% in Thailand, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Spain ranks 168th and Thailand ranks 170th of 190 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Spain | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.2% | 12.4% | 4.8% | Spain |
| 2010s | 17.7% | 15.1% | 2.6% | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Spain or Thailand?
- Spain, at 17.2% against 16.9% in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Spain and Thailand?
- 0.3%, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Thailand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Spain and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Spain ranks 168th and Thailand ranks 170th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.