South Sudan vs Syria: Enforcing contracts: Cost
South Sudan
30.0%
in 2019
Syria
29.3%
in 2019
South Sudan rank
83rd
Syria rank
86th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- South Sudan
- Syria
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 30.0% against 29.3% in Syria, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 83rd and Syria ranks 86th of 191 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, South Sudan or Syria?
- South Sudan, at 30.0% against 29.3% in Syria as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between South Sudan and Syria?
- 0.7%, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Syria?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do South Sudan and Syria rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- South Sudan ranks 83rd and Syria ranks 86th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.