South Sudan vs Sweden: Enforcing contracts: Cost
South Sudan
30.0%
in 2019
Sweden
30.4%
in 2019
South Sudan rank
83rd
Sweden rank
80th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- South Sudan
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 30.4% against 30.0% in South Sudan, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 83rd and Sweden ranks 80th of 191 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, South Sudan or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 30.4% against 30.0% in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between South Sudan and Sweden?
- 0.4%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Sweden?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do South Sudan and Sweden rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- South Sudan ranks 83rd and Sweden ranks 80th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.