Slovenia vs Tanzania: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Slovenia
12.7%
in 2019
Tanzania
14.3%
in 2019
Slovenia rank
187th
Tanzania rank
185th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Slovenia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 14.3% against 12.7% in Slovenia, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Slovenia ahead.
Slovenia ranks 187th and Tanzania ranks 185th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovenia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.1% | 14.3% | 3.8% | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 12.7% | 14.3% | 1.6% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Slovenia or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 14.3% against 12.7% in Slovenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Slovenia and Tanzania?
- 1.6%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Tanzania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Slovenia and Tanzania rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Slovenia ranks 187th and Tanzania ranks 185th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.