Rwanda vs Vanuatu: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Rwanda
64.6%
in 2019
Vanuatu
56.0%
in 2019
Rwanda rank
15th
Vanuatu rank
17th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Rwanda
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 64.6% against 56.0% in Vanuatu, a difference of 8.6%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Vanuatu's.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 15th and Vanuatu ranks 17th of 188 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.5% | 56.0% | 24.5% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 70.6% | 56.0% | 14.6% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Rwanda or Vanuatu?
- Rwanda, at 64.6% against 56.0% in Vanuatu as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Rwanda and Vanuatu?
- 8.6%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Vanuatu?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Rwanda and Vanuatu rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Rwanda ranks 15th and Vanuatu ranks 17th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.