Romania vs Singapore: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Romania
25.8%
in 2019
Singapore
25.8%
in 2019
Romania rank
111th
Singapore rank
111th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Romania
- Singapore
How they compare
Romania currently reports 25.8% against 25.8% in Singapore, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 111th and Singapore ranks 111th of 191 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.1% | 20.1% | 2.0% | Singapore |
| 2010s | 25.8% | 25.8% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Romania or Singapore?
- Romania, at 25.8% against 25.8% in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Romania and Singapore?
- 0.0%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Singapore?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Romania and Singapore rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Romania ranks 111th and Singapore ranks 111th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.