Qatar vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Qatar
21.6%
in 2019
Tunisia
21.8%
in 2019
Qatar rank
145th
Tunisia rank
143rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Qatar
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 21.8% against 21.6% in Qatar, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 145th and Tunisia ranks 143rd of 190 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.6% | 21.8% | 0.2% | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 21.6% | 21.8% | 0.2% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Qatar or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 21.8% against 21.6% in Qatar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Qatar and Tunisia?
- 0.2%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Tunisia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Qatar and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Qatar ranks 145th and Tunisia ranks 143rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.