Qatar vs Somalia: Enforcing contracts: Cost

Qatar
21.6%
in 2019
Somalia
21.4%
in 2019
Qatar rank
145th
Somalia rank
147th

Enforcing contracts: Cost over time

  • Qatar
  • Somalia
05101520200720132019

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 21.6% against 21.4% in Somalia, a difference of 0.2%.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.

Qatar ranks 145th and Somalia ranks 147th of 190 countries.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Qatar or Somalia?
Qatar, at 21.6% against 21.4% in Somalia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Qatar and Somalia?
0.2%, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Somalia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Qatar and Somalia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
Qatar ranks 145th and Somalia ranks 147th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Somalia: Enforcing contracts: Cost. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-2/qatar/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-cost-percent-of-claim-2/qatar/somalia-fed-rep/">Qatar vs Somalia: Enforcing contracts: Cost</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim)
Unit
% of claim
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.