Paraguay vs Sweden: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Paraguay
30.0%
in 2019
Sweden
30.4%
in 2019
Paraguay rank
82nd
Sweden rank
79th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Paraguay
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 30.4% against 30.0% in Paraguay, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Paraguay ranks 82nd and Sweden ranks 79th of 190 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.0% | 31.3% | 1.3% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 30.0% | 30.8% | 0.8% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Paraguay or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 30.4% against 30.0% in Paraguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Paraguay and Sweden?
- 0.4%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Sweden?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Paraguay and Sweden rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Paraguay ranks 82nd and Sweden ranks 79th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.